Hugging Face · BLOOM

BLOOM 176B

READER SUMMARY

An open-access 176-billion-parameter multilingual autoregressive language model from the BigScience collaboration.

DOOM SCORE44.0out of 100model risk profile, not the overall index
CURRENT ASSESSMENT · REVISION 1

Why this model scores 44.0

BLOOM offered strong multilingual generation at frontier scale with broad downloadable access, producing high deployment and meaningful misuse exposure. It had little inherent agency and its open governance improved transparency while making centralized control harder.

Capability47
Autonomy2
Deployment68
Misuse potential39
Control difficulty46
0 comments · 0 votesOpen discussion

Public discussion is readable by everyone. Sign in to comment, reply, or vote.

No comments yet. Start the discussion.

MODEL-ATTRIBUTED EVIDENCE

News tied to BLOOM 176B

The model score of 44.0 rates this model's risk profile. The overall Doom Index of 60.4 measures the recalibrated complete evidence corpus. These values answer different questions.

NET MODEL-ATTRIBUTED INDEX CONTRIBUTION+0.03

Each article's leave-one-out Doom Index contribution is divided equally among the exact models named on that article. This prevents multi-model evidence from being claimed in full on several model pages. Model risk scores are recalculated from their technical profile and related news, but never feed back into the overall index.

AUDIT TRAIL

Model score history

  1. R1
    Doom Score 44.0

    New exact public model with original release evidence and five evidence-based dimension inputs.

    12 Aug 2026